Guido wrote: > I'm not sure I aggree here. While it's correct that git does great at > detecting renames on merges it wouldn't know about these on the upstream > branch itself, right?
Wrong :). It *is* sufficient to record upstream changes as add's and rm's. When recording, git does not care any second whether you did a rename or not. It does not have to know about them, it just detects them when it needs to. Best regards, -- Yann. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
