Bug#409461: bash: /usr/bin/bashbug doesn't have a man-page

2007-02-03 Thread Robert Waldner
On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:43:16 +0100, Matthias Klose writes: >> Which, in my reading, suggests that even a small utility like bashbug >> should have its own man-page, even if it's just for cosmetics. >... unless you would like to send a patch. cheers, &rw .\" Process this file with .\" groff -man

Bug#409461: bash: /usr/bin/bashbug doesn't have a man-page

2007-02-03 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 409461 + wontfix thanks ... unless you would like to send a patch. > Which, in my reading, suggests that even a small utility like bashbug > should have its own man-page, even if it's just for cosmetics. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Bug#409461: bash: /usr/bin/bashbug doesn't have a man-page

2007-02-03 Thread Robert Waldner
Package: bash Version: 3.1dfsg-8 Severity: minor The Debian policy states in 12.1 "Each program, utility, and function should have an associated manual page included in the same package." Which, in my reading, suggests that even a small utility like bashbug should have its own man-page, even if