On 08/01/19 11:40 +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy said ...
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:44:43AM +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:47:05PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> > > Upstream has suggested that we stop shipping an elinks.conf and do code
> > > modifications that'
On 08/01/14 11:44 +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy said ...
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:47:05PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> > PS: In case you are interested in elinks package, please do help us
> > triage (alebit carefully :)) some of the bugs in the BTS. That would be
> > of great help more th
On 08/01/13 13:03 +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy said ...
> I made another patch, this one uses the quilt patch system instead of
> patching by yourself.
Thank you, however the elinks package maintainers have decided that we
wouldn't be using either dpatch or quilt for now.
Giridhar
--
Y Giridhar App
Hello,
I made another patch, this one uses the quilt patch system instead of
patching by yourself.
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital design engineer
GPG KeyID: 0x9DCA0B27 (@ subkeys.pgp.net)
GPG Fingerprint: 087D 3767 8CAC 65B1 8F6C 156E D325 C3C8 9DCA 0B27
diff -urN /tmp/o
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:56:29AM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> Please file a patch against this bug and add the patch tag. Also please
> don't upload the entire diff.gz, just the patch (you will likely have to
> make other changes like modifying what is downloaded via get-orig-source
> t
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:56:29AM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> Please file a patch against this bug and add the patch tag. Also please
> don't upload the entire diff.gz, just the patch (you will likely have to
> make other changes like modifying what is downloaded via get-orig-source
> t
On 08/01/10 19:45 +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy said ...
> Well, the reason that I made it in another binary target was the
> reasons you mentioned: that some features can be unstable or so.
experimental is exactly for that. See the developers reference (4.6.4
Distributions).
> Ok, I'll do the change
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:02:17PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> Hi, this would be more useful if it were done in the "elinks" binary
> package proper (rather than create a new binary package) and if it were
> based on elinks 0.11.3-1 [1] which would be uploaded to Debian unstable
> anytime
On 08/01/10 08:40 +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy said ...
> That's great, I actually have been making a package for the upcoming
> version (0.12) of elinks. I added a new binary target called
> elinks-full. In that target all features are enabled except for FSP
> support as it depends on a library (libfs
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 08:22:15PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> # Bcc: control
> tags 408610 + wontfix
> thanks
> However, we intend to make ELinks packages for experimental in which
> plenty of features will be enabled -- with the intent of giving exposure
> to upcoming upstream releases
# Bcc: control
tags 408610 + wontfix
thanks
On 07/01/27 13:14 +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy said ...
> It would be nice to have an elinks package with all features compiled
> in it.
ELinks will most certainly have experimental features and/or code that
is unstable, casuing security issues, license inc
Package: elinks
Version: 0.11.1-1.2
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to have an elinks package with all features compiled in
it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo
