On 08/01/19 11:40 +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy said ... > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:44:43AM +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:47:05PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > > > Upstream has suggested that we stop shipping an elinks.conf and do code > > > modifications that'd reflect when local configuration modifications are > > > done. We would probably do that. > > > You mean that after building elinks, you would run elinks -config-dump ? > > I found out that I mis-understood you. I think you meant patching the > elinks code to set the default values of configuration options. > > That's what I did in the diff attached in this email. This time I > removed elinks*.conf that I had put in debian/, and I added a patch to > set ui.leds.enable to 0 by default.
It is not necessary to set that to 0 if we disable LED functionality (like in 0.11.3-2). I will send a mail to upstream about packaging 0.12 for experimental and we can take this forward. See you on elinks-dev :) Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://www.appaji.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature