On 08/01/19 11:40 +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy said ...
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:44:43AM +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:47:05PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> > > Upstream has suggested that we stop shipping an elinks.conf and do code
> > > modifications that'd reflect when local configuration modifications are
> > > done.   We would probably do that.
> 
> > You mean that after building elinks, you would run elinks -config-dump ?
> 
> I found out that I mis-understood you. I think you meant patching the 
> elinks code to set the default values of configuration options.
> 
> That's what I did in the diff attached in this email. This time I 
> removed elinks*.conf that I had put in debian/, and I added a patch to 
> set ui.leds.enable to 0 by default.

It is not necessary to set that to 0 if we disable LED functionality
(like in 0.11.3-2).  I will send a mail to upstream about packaging 0.12
for experimental and we can take this forward.  See you on elinks-dev :)

Giridhar

-- 
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://www.appaji.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to