Bug#406766: Re: Bug#406766: Cacti plugin architecture

2011-12-30 Thread Mahyuddin Susanto
tags 40676 - patch stop Hello On 01/-9/-28163 02:59 AM, crig...@criggie.dyndns.org wrote: > On 28/12/11 04:01, Jean-François Masure wrote: >> Upstream now includes a patched version of source files with the >> plugin architecture for the new 0.8.7i >> http://www.cacti.net/downloads/cacti-0.8.7i-

Bug#406766: Cacti plugin architecture

2011-12-27 Thread criggie
On 28/12/11 04:01, Jean-François Masure wrote: Upstream now includes a patched version of source files with the plugin architecture for the new 0.8.7i http://www.cacti.net/downloads/cacti-0.8.7i-PIA-3.1.tar.gz it should now be easier to include it with the Debian package. There might be some us

Bug#406766: Cacti plugin architecture

2011-12-27 Thread Jean-François Masure
Upstream now includes a patched version of source files with the plugin architecture for the new 0.8.7i http://www.cacti.net/downloads/cacti-0.8.7i-PIA-3.1.tar.gz it should now be easier to include it with the Debian package. There might be some users who don't want the Plugin Architecture inclu

Bug#406766: cacti plugin architecture patch

2007-09-13 Thread Paulo Costa
> ah, you should try patching the source package instead of the binary > package. > try: > apt-get build-dep cacti > apt-get source cacti > cd cacti- > > dpkg-buildpackage > sean Dear Sean, Your procedure don't work. An error report with dpkg-buildpackage after patching cacti

Bug#406766: Cacti plugin architecture

2007-08-18 Thread sean finney
On Saturday 18 August 2007 03:21:19 am Dennis Devriendt wrote: > > could you be more specific on what you mean by "quite significant > > changes"? > > > not counting the "official" patches from cacti.net, the version in > > unstable > > > only differs by 9 lines or so. > > I didn't look very well i

Bug#406766: Cacti plugin architecture

2007-08-18 Thread Dennis Devriendt
> could you be more specific on what you mean by "quite significant changes"? > not counting the "official" patches from cacti.net, the version in unstable > only differs by 9 lines or so. I didn't look very well in this, but because you made some changes to the structure of the cacti directory (s

Bug#406766: Cacti plugin architecture

2007-08-17 Thread sean finney
hi, (forwarding this to the existing bug report) On Thursday 16 August 2007 12:26:08 pm you wrote: > I'm sorry to bother you this way, but I was wondering if you have any > intentions to integrate the plugin architecture for cacti into the debian > package. Since you made quite significant change