hi, (forwarding this to the existing bug report)
On Thursday 16 August 2007 12:26:08 pm you wrote:
> I'm sorry to bother you this way, but I was wondering if you have any
> intentions to integrate the plugin architecture for cacti into the debian
> package. Since you made quite significant changes, cacti can't be patched
> with the plugin architecture.
could you be more specific on what you mean by "quite significant changes"?
not counting the "official" patches from cacti.net, the version in unstable
only differs by 9 lines or so.
> However, it seems to me that adding this to
> the debian package would give a lot more flexibility. Somebody already sent
> this in as a wishlist, but that was a while ago and I just want to know if
> we can expect this in a future release. Otherwise, I will have to switch to
> the real source.
i'm not against adding it, though i don't have a lot of time to evaluate it
either. since this is a third party patch (though there's lots of reference
to it in official cacti documentation) i'd like to hear from one of the main
cacti devs about what they think of it as well. of course if someone helped
out to lessen my workload on either of these fronts (providing a patch and/or
contacting the upstream author) it would certainly help things along.
sean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
