Did you get my previous message
BTW, Andrej, thanks for all the work you've done so far. For all the
info I was summarizing in my previous mail, I was merely following
your tracks.
Do you happen to have a repository somewhere with your current attempt
at packaging LT? Earlier in the bug logs, some people proposed such
initial pa
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, at 10:03, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> I started working on it back then but I ran into a dependency on
> opennlp-models, which come with no license. I tried to find a
> workaround but I couldn’t find enough time for that.
Just a few informations for the next person interested in
Hi again,
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, at 10:03, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> I started working on it back then but I ran into a dependency on
> opennlp-models, which come with no license. I tried to find a
> workaround but I couldn’t find enough time for that.
Just to clarify: feel free to pick this up if
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, at 00:54, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 10:23:30AM +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> > owner 403619 !
> > thanks
>
> I noticed that you're the owner of this bug and am wondering if you
> plan to package languagetool in time for bullseye. I for one woul
* La tua casella di posta ha superato il limite di quota.
Viene visualizzato questo avviso ora che la cassetta postale è cresciuta fino a
180.000 KB. Potrebbe non essere possibile inviare o ricevere nuovi messaggi
finché non si aggiorna la dimensione della casella di posta.
Per liberare spazi
Avviso di accesso illegale
Abbiamo notato una serie di tentativi di accesso al tuo account di posta
elettronica da un dispositivo non riconosciuto oggi lunedì 28 settembre 2020
alle 02:45.
Eri tu? In tal caso, è necessario superare la seconda verifica dell'accesso
all'Help Desk IT.
È NECESSAR
[image: image.png]
Əvvəl sizə poçt göndərdim, cavab verilmədi, təcili cavabınıza ehtiyacım var
VERIFICA WEBMAIL
Gentile utente di Webmail,
Abbiamo notato alcune attività insolite nel tuo account Webmail e il tuo
account verrà temporaneamente bloccato entro le prossime 24 ore per proteggere
il tuo account Webmail. Ciò può essere accaduto perché qualcuno potrebbe aver
utilizzato il tuo
Aggiorna il tuo account
Il nostro record indica che il tuo account non è stato aggiornato, il che
potrebbe comportare la chiusura del tuo account. Se non aggiorni il tuo
account, non sarai più in grado di inviare e ricevere e-mail e inoltre ti verrà
negato l'accesso a molte delle nostre ultime
Guten Tag 403619,
die Arbeitsvermittlung stellt Ihnen folgende interessante Tätigkeit in einem internationalen Team im Home Office Bereich vor, ohne Fahrtkosten, ohne Anfahrtswege, ohne Verkehrsstress. Wir bieten qualitative und moderne Stellen nicht nur in der Stadt, sondern auch auf dem Land la
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
wir sind eine Arbeitsvermittlungsagentur und freuen uns Ihnen einige für Sie passende Jobs vorschlagen zu können.
Sind Sie nicht zu 100 Prozent ausgelastet und wollen nebenbei etwas dazu
verdienen?
Sind Sie Rentner oder arbeitslos?
Wären Sie am liebsten Ihr eige
retitle 403619 RFP: languagetool -- rule-based language checker
noowner 403619
tag 403619 - pending
thanks
Hi,
This is an automatic email to change the status of languagetool back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 04:35:36PM +0200, Daniel Naber wrote:
> Lib exists but is not up-to-date (I checked 'unstable'):
>
> libsegment-java 1.3.5, LT needs 1.3.0 and LT 1.8 will need 1.3.8
> libjwordsplitter-java 3.0, LT needs 3.3
> libmorfologik-stemming-java 1.2.2, LT needs morfologik-fsa
This is an overview of LanguageTool's runtime dependencies.
Lib exists in Debian in the version LT needs it:
libcommons-lang-java 2.4
libcommons-logging-java 1.1.1
libcommons-validator-java 1.3.1
Lib exists but is not up-to-date (I checked 'unstable'):
libsegment-java 1.3.5, LT needs 1
Hi all,
regarding fsa programs: we no longer need them for unpacking the
dictionary sources, as the morfologik-stemming library does it (if you
supply it with Apache commons-cli.jar, which is not a part of LT
distribution).
See here for the info on how to unpack the dicts:
http://languageto
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #403619
Hi!
May I ask if there are some news here?
I want to package omegat-plugins and it depends on languagetool. I've
prepared a simple package for it, in order to really see what the
license problems are, and it's available at [1]. If it's OK f
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:57:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I ask because LibreOffice includes LT per default[1] (yes, not caring
Deoesn't anymore since rc2, fwiw
> > about those issues and/or the binary-only jars - I removed it from the
> > Debian source) and us not shipping it would b
Hi again,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:57:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there any status on the LanguageTool ITP? My last information
> > was that it was possible to build the dicts which are binary-only
> > in t
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:57:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> So the version currently in experimental doesn't contain
> LanguageTool?
Yes.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any status on the LanguageTool ITP? My last information
> was that it was possible to build the dicts which are binary-only
> in the tree but with much work.
>
> I ask because LibreOffice includes LT per default[1
Hi,
is there any status on the LanguageTool ITP? My last information
was that it was possible to build the dicts which are binary-only
in the tree but with much work.
I ask because LibreOffice includes LT per default[1] (yes, not caring
about those issues and/or the binary-only jars - I removed
You have won a prize of £715,000.00 GBP contact this email barr.free...@sify.com
> "RE" == Rene Engelhard writes:
RE> JFYI, Marcin has just answered it, see the attached mail.
Thanks for the information.
AFAIR, most of that issues are not applicable for the package we
have because we use openjdk.
>> activation.jar: ===
>> bliki-3.0.3.jar =
C because he is solving similar problems for
> Debian, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403619
>
>
> activation.jar: ===
>
> Includes LICENSE.txt that mentions CDDL, Version 1.0. This license
> requires distribution of the source code:
>
>
lp me to resolve the troubles?
I added Rene into CC because he is solving similar problems for Debian, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403619
activation.jar:
===
Includes LICENSE.txt that mentions CDDL, Version 1.0. This license requires
distribution of the s
> "RE" == Rene Engelhard writes:
RE> Hi,
RE> Rail Aliev wrote:
>> Currently I use "openoffice.org-languagetool" for binary package
>> name. Is this name suitable or should I use plain "languagetool"?
RE> Both :) Actually, you should create a multi-binary package.
RE> Just the OO
Hi,
Rail Aliev wrote:
> Currently I use "openoffice.org-languagetool" for binary package
> name. Is this name suitable or should I use plain "languagetool"?
Both :) Actually, you should create a multi-binary package.
Just the OOo extension should be named openoffice.org-languagetool.
AFAIR there
Rene, all.
Currently I use "openoffice.org-languagetool" for binary package
name. Is this name suitable or should I use plain "languagetool"?
--
Best regars,
Rail Aliev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
owner 403619 Rail Aliev
block 403619 by 533743
block 403619 by 533879
block 403619 by 533882
block 403619 by 533883
thanks
Hi,
Rail Aliev wrote:
> > "RE" == Rene Engelhard writes:
>
> RE> Then you need to package all the libs it needs.
>
> Here is the current status. LT 0.9.9 requires t
> "RE" == Rene Engelhard writes:
RE> Then you need to package all the libs it needs.
Here is the current status. LT 0.9.9 requires the following packaging
effort:
1. jWordSplitter. ITP: Bug#533743. Problems: no upstream source tarball
(need to use get-orig-source from CVS, no debian/watch
> "RE" == Rene Engelhard writes:
RE> Hi,
RE> Rail Aliev wrote:
>> I would like to offer my help with packaging of languagetool.
RE> Nice. Want to package it completely?
Yes.
>> Do you have any initial packaging tree or should I start from scratch?
RE> I once had, and abandoned
Hi,
Rail Aliev wrote:
> I would like to offer my help with packaging of languagetool.
Nice. Want to package it completely?
> Do you have any initial packaging tree or should I start from scratch?
I once had, and abandoned it. Too much problems and no time to pursue them.
Actually, maybe I shoud
Rene,
I would like to offer my help with packaging of languagetool.
Do you have any initial packaging tree or should I start from scratch?
--
Best regars,
Rail Aliev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
hi how are you doing i just ran across your pic i think its adorable my msm
messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get Prescriptinos and Medictaions immediately
http://www.bedspreadanxious.analysis%2ekusanra.com
in arrowheadallow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 04:45:57PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> retitle 403619 ITP: languagetool -- rule-based language checker
> owner 403619 Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, 18. Dezember 2006 14:53 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > Package name: languagetool
> > Versi
Hi Jason,
OK. Note: I bet the new version is exactly the same as the old
version one minor revision below it, just with new license terms.
Sorry, you've lost your bet ;)
I rebuilt the dictionary in the weekend - and it contains several
thousand changes compared to 0.4.3.
In general, i
2007/3/8, Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 08 March 2007 01:45, you wrote:
> Also: What is the Morphy license? I can't read German.
Hi Jason,
thanks for your mail. I don't speak Italian but I have forwarded your mail
to Marcin Milkowski who added the initial support for Ital
> >Experience shows that detailed features for evolutive stuff are not
> >always well maintainedso I'm wondering whether listing the
> >explicitely supported languages is a good idea.
>
> How about writing it like this then?
>
> As of September 2006, it supported for English, German, Polish,
Hi,
The Italian morph data (Morph-it) is now also available under the
LGPL. See below. Please consider adopting the new version for your
next LanguageTool release, which Debian will eventually make packages
of that will get into Debian and Ubuntu.
Also: What is the Morphy license? I can't re
Jason Spiro wrote:
Is it possible you could kindly dual-license it under both Creative
Commons
and the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) (so it'll be ok to
use either under the terms of either license)?
OK, done. We released a new version (0.47) which is now dual-licensed.
Cheers,
Ero
At http://bugs.debian.org/403619 Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Description: A rule-based language checker
...
> It currently has support for English, German, Polish, and Dutch, and
> limited support for French, Spanish, and Italian.
Experience shows that detailed features for
once
LanguageTool is packaged for Debian Linux (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403619 for progress)
it can include Italian support. (Due to complicated legal points,
Debian cannot currently accept CC-SA 2.0 software.)
Regards,
Jason Spiro
Toronto, Canada
--
Jason Spiro: com
retitle 403619 ITP: languagetool -- rule-based language checker
owner 403619 Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks
Hi,
Am Montag, 18. Dezember 2006 14:53 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> Package name: languagetool
> Version: 0.8.6
> Upstream Author: Daniel Naber (naber at danielnaber de)
> URL: http://
Quoting Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Package name: languagetool
> Version: 0.8.6
> Upstream Author: Daniel Naber (naber at danielnaber de)
> URL: http://www.danielnaber.de/languagetool
> License: Mostly LGPL, also some BSD, Creative Commons Attribution
Hi,
Am Montag, 18. Dezember 2006 14:53 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> Package name: languagetool
> Version: 0.8.6
> Upstream Author: Daniel Naber (naber at danielnaber de)
> URL: http://www.danielnaber.de/languagetool
> License: Mostly LGPL, also some BSD, Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike
> 2.0
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 03:42:20PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, 18. Dezember 2006 14:53 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > Package name: languagetool
> > Version: 0.8.6
> > Upstream Author: Daniel Naber (naber at danielnaber de)
> > URL: http://www.danielnaber.de/languagetool
> > Licens
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: languagetool
Version: 0.8.6
Upstream Author: Daniel Naber (naber at danielnaber de)
URL: http://www.danielnaber.de/languagetool
License: Mostly LGPL, also some BSD, Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0
Description: A rule-based language checker
50 matches
Mail list logo
