>>>>> "RE" == Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> writes:
RE> Hi, RE> Rail Aliev wrote: >> Currently I use "openoffice.org-languagetool" for binary package >> name. Is this name suitable or should I use plain "languagetool"? RE> Both :) Actually, you should create a multi-binary package. RE> Just the OOo extension should be named openoffice.org-languagetool. RE> AFAIR there's also a standalone Java app, that should be in RE> languagetool. Hmm. Good to know. OOo extension is ready, need to investigate how standlaone version works. RE> See e.g. the writer2latex source package for inspiration. RE> Please also do not forget to patch out any bundling of jars into the oxt RE> and just depend on the libs used from openoffice.org-languagetool RE> (and for languagetool anyway) Already done ;) See http://bzr.debian.org/users/rail-guest/languagetool/ for packaging and http://alioth.debian.org/~rail-guest/languagetool/ for ready packages. -- Best regars, Rail Aliev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
