Bug#402583: must not depend on update-inetd

2006-12-12 Thread Ian Beckwith
tags 402583 + pending thanks On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 02:04:13AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 12, Ian Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 1: Drop the dependencies on netbase and update-inetd > Yes. > > > 2: Depend on openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver > Yes. > > > 3: Wrap the calls t

Bug#402583: must not depend on update-inetd

2006-12-11 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 12, Ian Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1: Drop the dependencies on netbase and update-inetd Yes. > 2: Depend on openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver Yes. > 3: Wrap the calls to update-inetd with if [ -x /usr/sbin/update-inetd ] No, so far there are no plans to stop providing this inter

Bug#402583: must not depend on update-inetd

2006-12-11 Thread Ian Beckwith
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 02:05:05PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Package: telnetd-ssl > Version: 0.17.24+0.1-15 > Severity: important > > Only inetd daemons should depend on the update-inetd package, and only > if they need it. oops. > The presence of the update-inetd package does not mean that a

Bug#402583: must not depend on update-inetd

2006-12-11 Thread Marco d'Itri
Package: telnetd-ssl Version: 0.17.24+0.1-15 Severity: important Only inetd daemons should depend on the update-inetd package, and only if they need it. The presence of the update-inetd package does not mean that an inetd daemon is installed. This was explained on [EMAIL PROTECTED] s/update-inetd