On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 16:34 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> On Son, 07 Jan 2007, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> > engine that support Unicode. In principle omega has been able to do that
> > for quite some time. Unfortunately almost nobody knows how to use it.
>
> Hmm, starting with Unicode % should
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 03:07 +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
[]
> So switching to Omega/Lambda seems for me, currently, a bit too soon,
> especially when it concerns CJK, because the font process looks
> exactly the same as on LaTeX, with an extra stage of OVP fonts.
"A bit to soon" sounds very e
Hi all!
On Son, 07 Jan 2007, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> engine that support Unicode. In principle omega has been able to do that
> for quite some time. Unfortunately almost nobody knows how to use it.
Hmm, starting with Unicode % should be enough to autodetect Unicode
input. The rest is TeXprogramming
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:44:03 +0100 (CET), Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
> The gsfonts-wadalab-* packages are the original Type1 fonts. I don't
> have them installed, and don't know what they are used for. I do know
> that they depend on defoma, so possibly they integrate in X, but I
> wouldn't know
From: Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:28 +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
> [ UTF-8 and TeX ]
> > There are packages like utf8x that are under development, but IMHO
> > that just takes too much time and we need a quick fix. UTF-8 has been
> > around for many years now.
>
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:28 +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
[ UTF-8 and TeX ]
> There are packages like utf8x that are under development, but IMHO
> that just takes too much time and we need a quick fix. UTF-8 has been
> around for many years now.
Actually utff8x (or more appropriately ucs.sty) are
From: Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 06:44:03PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
> >
> > I also think that latex-cjk-all (+fonts) should be enough as a
> > Build-Depends for debian-reference, since latex-cjk-common already
> > depends on tetex or texlive.
> >
> > But you mi
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 06:44:03PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
>
> >From: Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 02:33:44PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> > > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Package: debiandoc-sgml
> > > > Version: 1.1.99
> > > > Severi
From: Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 02:33:44PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Package: debiandoc-sgml
> > > Version: 1.1.99
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > debiandoc-sgml currently
> > >
> > > Recommends: libpaperg,
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 02:33:44PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: debiandoc-sgml
> > Version: 1.1.99
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > debiandoc-sgml currently
> >
> > Recommends: libpaperg, tetex-bin, tetex-extra, texinfo, latex-cjk-all,
> >
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: debiandoc-sgml
> Version: 1.1.99
> Severity: normal
>
> debiandoc-sgml currently
>
> Recommends: libpaperg, tetex-bin, tetex-extra, texinfo, latex-cjk-all, gs-esp
> | gs
>
> This should be changed to allow texlive to be used, too. I'm not sure
Package: debiandoc-sgml
Version: 1.1.99
Severity: normal
debiandoc-sgml currently
Recommends: libpaperg, tetex-bin, tetex-extra, texinfo, latex-cjk-all, gs-esp |
gs
This should be changed to allow texlive to be used, too. I'm not sure
which texlive packages are needed, but I'll investigate th
12 matches
Mail list logo
