Bug#401570: Processed: Re: Bug#401570: libswt3.2-gtk-jni: apt-get upgrade fails

2006-12-13 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 12/12/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... I don't see any conflicts between the -java packages, only the -jni packages. I guess the -jni packages do need to conflict with each other then, if they have file conflicts. Thank you for bringing to my attention that only the -jni pa

Bug#401570: Processed: Re: Bug#401570: libswt3.2-gtk-jni: apt-get upgrade fails

2006-12-13 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 12/12/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should libswt-gtk-3.2-java (my package) conflict with > libswt3.2-gtk-java (the package from Eclipse)? Since Eclipse is not in > stable or testing (as you noted), I'm unsure if conflicting is > necessary. Is it sufficient for libswt3.2-gtk-

Bug#401570: Processed: Re: Bug#401570: libswt3.2-gtk-jni: apt-get upgrade fails

2006-12-12 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 401570 serious tags 401570 sid thanks Hi Shaun, On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:01:43PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > On 12/5/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... > >reassign 401570 libswt-gtk-3.2-jni > >severity 401570 important > >AFAICS, libswt3.2-gtk-jni has been *superseded*

Bug#401570: Processed: Re: Bug#401570: libswt3.2-gtk-jni: apt-get upgrade fails

2006-12-05 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 12/5/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... reassign 401570 libswt-gtk-3.2-jni severity 401570 important AFAICS, libswt3.2-gtk-jni has been *superseded* by libswt-gtk-3.2-jni, and libswt3.2-gtk-jni was never in testing or stable (and only briefly in unstable), so this bug doesn't war