Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-12 Thread Peter Eckersley
Hi James, many thanks for trying so hard on this bug. Hopefully if it doesn't occur on sarge -> etch there won't be too many people bitten by it. I found that removing the dpkg-diversion and reinstalling the vim packages was not sufficient to fix the problem -- but with the additional step of d

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-11 Thread James Vega
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:23:43AM -0500, James Vega wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 04:31:18PM -0500, James Vega wrote: > > Ah, you're right. The /usr/bin/vim binary you have is probably a > > version of Vim 6.3 so it'll be looking for /usr/share/vim/vim63. The > > URL you posted in a previous

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-05 Thread James Vega
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 04:31:18PM -0500, James Vega wrote: > Ah, you're right. The /usr/bin/vim binary you have is probably a > version of Vim 6.3 so it'll be looking for /usr/share/vim/vim63. The > URL you posted in a previous email isn't working, but I'll give try a > stable -> etch upgrade in

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-04 Thread Peter Eckersley
On 04/12/06, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ah, you're right. The /usr/bin/vim binary you have is probably a version of Vim 6.3 so it'll be looking for /usr/share/vim/vim63. The URL you posted in a previous email isn't working, but I'll give try a stable -> etch upgrade in the next cou

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-04 Thread Peter Eckersley
On 04/12/06, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My runtime path is pretty weird: > > runtimepath=~/.vim,/usr/share/vim/vimfiles,/usr/share/vim,/usr/share/vim/vimfiles/after,~/.vim/after > > I guess that's being set by the old binary that's in /usr/bin/vim Or you're setting it in ~/.vimrc.

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-04 Thread Peter Eckersley
On 04/12/06, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's odd because the first thing /etc/vim/vimrc does is to source /usr/share/vim/vim70/debian.vim and that sets the proper 'runtimepath'. Do you not have a /usr/share/vim/vim70/debian.vim? Well yes /etc/vim/vimrc runs runtime! debian.vim

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-04 Thread James Vega
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 12:43:27PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote: > On 04/12/06, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> My runtime path is pretty weird: > >> > >> > >runtimepath=~/.vim,/usr/share/vim/vimfiles,/usr/share/vim,/usr/share/vim/vimfiles/after,~/.vim/after > >> > >> I guess tha

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-04 Thread James Vega
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 12:08:07PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote: > On 04/12/06, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:59:45PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote: > >> After a recent upgrade (to version 7+), vim on my system stopped > >decompressing > >> .gz files automat

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-04 Thread James Vega
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:01:29PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote: > On 04/12/06, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >That's odd because the first thing /etc/vim/vimrc does is to source > >/usr/share/vim/vim70/debian.vim and that sets the proper 'runtimepath'. > >Do you not have a /usr/s

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-04 Thread Peter Eckersley
On 04/12/06, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:59:45PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote: > After a recent upgrade (to version 7+), vim on my system stopped decompressing > .gz files automatically. This looks a bit like #348661. If this is the same problem as #348661,

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-04 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:54:44PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote: > Unfortunately I can't, unless apt keeps a log of this stuff that I'm not > aware of. /var/log/dpkg.log has it, I think it has been enabled for every apt by default for quite a long time now. > This system has been alive in vario

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-04 Thread Peter Eckersley
Unfortunately I can't, unless apt keeps a log of this stuff that I'm not aware of. This system has been alive in various incarnations for many years (at least five, I'd say) and has been apt-get upgraded quite a number of times along the way. I think my previous version of vim was 6.xish? But i

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-04 Thread James Vega
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:59:45PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote: > After a recent upgrade (to version 7+), vim on my system stopped decompressing > .gz files automatically. This looks a bit like #348661. If this is the same problem as #348661, then you chose not to accept the maintainer version

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-12-03 Thread James Vega
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:59:45PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote: > After a recent upgrade (to version 7+), vim on my system stopped decompressing > .gz files automatically. This looks a bit like #348661. > > vim.{full,gnome,gtk,basic} all handle the .gz files correctly. It > looks like /usr/bi

Bug#401000: vim: Vim not handling .gz files anymore

2006-11-29 Thread Peter Eckersley
Package: vim Version: 1:7.0-164+1 Severity: normal After a recent upgrade (to version 7+), vim on my system stopped decompressing .gz files automatically. This looks a bit like #348661. vim.{full,gnome,gtk,basic} all handle the .gz files correctly. It looks like /usr/bin/vim is some weird f