Hi,
As I checked, courier-authdaemon has:
-rw-rw 1 daemon daemon 3654 Aug 31 20:40 /etc/courier/authdaemonrc
So daemon:mail as I suggested works without problem. If mail:mail was
used, dpkg-statoverride is needed.
It is worthy to mention the following difference in documentation:
courier
Hi,
http://bugs.debian.org/394779
I retract my previous comment on this bug. I was confused.
I think what Josip mentions initially on this bus gives good starting
point. Since the courier package has not change since then, reasonable
thing to do is document the best practice to work around the
Hi,
Le mardi 24 octobre 2006 à 09:39 +0200, Josip Rodin a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:01:29AM +0200, William Steve Applegate wrote:
> > > * change permissions of those files to be mail:mail
> >
> > That would be a lousy choice, as I suppose this change would be
> > silently overridden on
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:01:29AM +0200, William Steve Applegate wrote:
> > * change permissions of those files to be mail:mail
>
> That would be a lousy choice, as I suppose this change would be
> silently overridden on the next courier-authdaemon upgrade.
...no different from the permissions o
In litteris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josip Rodin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scripsit:
> * make maildrop setgid daemon, although I don't reckon that would work
> well if you still need to setgid mail (in order to lock files in /var/mail).
That seems to work, and it's clearly better than having another setui
Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 12:33:46PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
drwxr-xr-x daemon/daemon 0 2006-09-09 21:54:23 ./var/run/courier/
drwxr-x--- daemon/daemon 0 2006-09-09 21:54:23
./var/run/courier/authdaemon/
* ask the maintainer or courier-authdaemon and courier-mai
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 12:33:46PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
> >>>drwxr-xr-x daemon/daemon 0 2006-09-09 21:54:23 ./var/run/courier/
> >>>drwxr-x--- daemon/daemon 0 2006-09-09 21:54:23
> >>>./var/run/courier/authdaemon/
> >>>* ask the maintainer or courier-authdaemon and courier-maildro
Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
drwxr-xr-x daemon/daemon 0 2006-09-09 21:54:23 ./var/run/courier/
drwxr-x--- daemon/daemon 0 2006-09-09 21:54:23 ./var/run/courier/authdaemon/
* ask the maintainer or courier-authdaemon and courier-maild
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
> >drwxr-xr-x daemon/daemon 0 2006-09-09 21:54:23 ./var/run/courier/
> >drwxr-x--- daemon/daemon 0 2006-09-09 21:54:23
> >./var/run/courier/authdaemon/
> >* ask the maintainer or courier-authdaemon and courier-maildrop what's
Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 03:12:33AM +0200, William Steve Applegate wrote:
After upgrading to the last release from an old customised one, I began
to see messages like that in my log file:
Oct 22 21:25:03 kingslanding postfix/pipe[10679]: 93DB3CEC92: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
o
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 03:12:33AM +0200, William Steve Applegate wrote:
> After upgrading to the last release from an old customised one, I began
> to see messages like that in my log file:
>
> Oct 22 21:25:03 kingslanding postfix/pipe[10679]: 93DB3CEC92: to=<[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>, orig_to=<[EMAI
Package: maildrop
Version: 2.0.2-11
Severity: normal
After upgrading to the last release from an old customised one, I began
to see messages like that in my log file:
Oct 22 21:25:03 kingslanding postfix/pipe[10679]: 93DB3CEC92: to=<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, orig_to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=maildro
12 matches
Mail list logo
