On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:06:23AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I'm not able to reproduce this bug here on amd64, perhaps you're using
> > packages that are not quite up-to-date?
> My goal is to rebuild etch on etch, so yes, my packages are not
> up-to-date (as in: same as in unstable).
Well,
On 17/10/06 at 18:26 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 393735 important
> tags 393735 moreinfo unreproducible
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 06:30:12PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > During a rebuilt of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
> > failed to build on AMD64
severity 393735 important
tags 393735 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 06:30:12PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuilt of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
> failed to build on AMD64.
> Relevant parts:
> # Build python packages
> cd python && LI
Package: diacanvas2
Version: 0.14.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
During a rebuilt of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
failed to build on AMD64.
Relevant parts:
# Build python packages
cd python && LIBRARY_PATH=../debian/tmp/usr/lib
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=../debian/t
4 matches
Mail list logo
