Bug#392107: ext2 revision 0 support broken

2006-10-17 Thread Theodore Tso
tags 392107 +pending severity normal thanks The following patch has been applied to the mainline repository. Since the Debian installer has a workaround for the bug, I've reassigned its severity to normal. - Ted # HG changeset patch # User [EMAIL

Bug#392107: ext2 revision 0 support broken

2006-10-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-10 09:09]: > instead. The -O none is superflous. I agree it shouldn't cause an > error, but it's not needed as it is implied by -r 0. Thanks, I've made this change in the installer. > Out of curiosity, why are some sub-architectures using this at all?

Bug#392107: ext2 revision 0 support broken

2006-10-10 Thread Theodore Tso
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:01:24PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: e2fslibs > Version: 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02+dfsg-1 > Severity: important > > When I try to create an ext2 revision 0 filesystem, I get the > following (imho bogus) error: > > 3834:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] mkfs.ext2 -r 0 -O

Bug#392107: ext2 revision 0 support broken

2006-10-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: e2fslibs Version: 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02+dfsg-1 Severity: important When I try to create an ext2 revision 0 filesystem, I get the following (imho bogus) error: 3834:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] mkfs.ext2 -r 0 -O none test mke2fs 1.40-WIP (02-Oct-2006) test is not a block special device. Proce