Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field

2007-10-03 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 12:36:49 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > The following patch has been reworked with additional > discussion on the mailing list. It supersedes are previous patches, and > incorporates material from everything earlier in the bug report. I'm attaching a patch on

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field

2007-05-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, The following patch has been reworked with additional discussion on the mailing list. It supersedes are previous patches, and incorporates material from everything earlier in the bug report. manoj diff -uBbwr developers-reference.orig/developers-reference.sgml developers-re

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field

2007-05-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 9 May 2007 00:07:26 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 02:13:56PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> The PTS already implements the fields referred to in this patch, so >> this is a working current practice, and I think we are way past the >> desi

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field

2007-05-08 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 02:13:56PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > The PTS already implements the fields referred to in this patch, > so this is a working current practice, and I think we are way past the > design phase, so there should be no objection to including this in the > develop

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field

2007-05-08 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, It has been a long time since there was any discussion on this. I have taken the last patch created by Stefano Zacchiroli, added an arch specific example, regenerated the patch against todays CVS of the developers reference, and attached it to this mail. The PTS already imp

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field

2006-11-15 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
[ added bug the bts as Cc ] On mar, 2006-11-14 at 12:55 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > I don't have objections (mainly because I don't know what a grab > > file is). More generally though I would like to know opinions about > > whether it would be the case to describe in the developers referen

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field

2006-11-14 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:31:32 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On dom, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific header, >> XS-Vcs- where name is one keyword from a specified list (bzr, >> cvs, svn, darcs, gi

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field

2006-11-13 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On dom, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > tla is wrong. The name of the protocol is arch; and tla and > baz are competing implementations of the standard. Agreed, will fix this. > I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific > header, XS-Vcs- wher

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field

2006-11-13 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific > header, XS-Vcs- where name is one keyword from a specified list > (bzr, cvs, svn, darcs, git, hf, or arch), and XS-VCS-Browse, which is > a plain old HTTP URL. Yes, thi

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field rewording

2006-11-12 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 13/11/2006, at 9:37 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: Op 12-11-2006 om 15:04 schreef Raphael Hertzog: On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Geert Stappers wrote: The text tells about the (upstream) source by using the generic name "package", the example tells about the Debian directory. So fix the wording...

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field rewording

2006-11-12 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 12-11-2006 om 15:04 schreef Raphael Hertzog: > On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Geert Stappers wrote: > > The text tells about the (upstream) source by using the generic name > > "package", the example tells about the Debian directory. > > So fix the wording... Value of this field should be an URL pointi

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field

2006-11-12 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, in bug #391023, this description of this field is given: +XS-Vcs-* + + (where Vcs is the acronym for Version Control System, + and * stands for one of the Vcs supported by the package + tracking system: bzr, cvs, darcs, + git, hg, svn, tla) + tla is

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field splitting into XS-Vcs-source & XS-Vcs-dpkg

2006-11-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Geert Stappers wrote: > The text tells about the (upstream) source by using the generic name > "package", the example tells about the Debian directory. So fix the wording... and don't change everything when there has been some serious discussion on -devel and when lots of pack

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field splitting into XS-Vcs-source & XS-Vcs-dpkg

2006-11-12 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 12-11-2006 om 09:58 schreef Andreas Barth: > Hi, > > in bug #391023, this description of this field is given: > +XS-Vcs-* > + > + Value of this field should be an URL pointing to where the repository > of > + the given package is available. The information is meant to be us

Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field

2006-11-12 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, in bug #391023, this description of this field is given: +XS-Vcs-* + + (where Vcs is the acronym for Version Control System, + and * stands for one of the Vcs supported by the package + tracking system: bzr, cvs, darcs, + git, hg, svn, tla) + + Value of