Hi,
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 12:36:49 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> The following patch has been reworked with additional
> discussion on the mailing list. It supersedes are previous patches, and
> incorporates material from everything earlier in the bug report.
I'm attaching a patch on
Hi,
The following patch has been reworked with additional
discussion on the mailing list. It supersedes are previous patches, and
incorporates material from everything earlier in the bug report.
manoj
diff -uBbwr developers-reference.orig/developers-reference.sgml developers-re
On Wed, 9 May 2007 00:07:26 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 02:13:56PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> The PTS already implements the fields referred to in this patch, so
>> this is a working current practice, and I think we are way past the
>> desi
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 02:13:56PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> The PTS already implements the fields referred to in this patch,
> so this is a working current practice, and I think we are way past the
> design phase, so there should be no objection to including this in the
> develop
Hi,
It has been a long time since there was any discussion on this.
I have taken the last patch created by Stefano Zacchiroli, added an
arch specific example, regenerated the patch against todays CVS of the
developers reference, and attached it to this mail.
The PTS already imp
[ added bug the bts as Cc ]
On mar, 2006-11-14 at 12:55 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > I don't have objections (mainly because I don't know what a grab
> > file is). More generally though I would like to know opinions about
> > whether it would be the case to describe in the developers referen
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:31:32 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On dom, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific header,
>> XS-Vcs- where name is one keyword from a specified list (bzr,
>> cvs, svn, darcs, gi
On dom, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> tla is wrong. The name of the protocol is arch; and tla and
> baz are competing implementations of the standard.
Agreed, will fix this.
> I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific
> header, XS-Vcs- wher
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific
> header, XS-Vcs- where name is one keyword from a specified list
> (bzr, cvs, svn, darcs, git, hf, or arch), and XS-VCS-Browse, which is
> a plain old HTTP URL.
Yes, thi
On 13/11/2006, at 9:37 AM, Geert Stappers wrote:
Op 12-11-2006 om 15:04 schreef Raphael Hertzog:
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Geert Stappers wrote:
The text tells about the (upstream) source by using the generic name
"package", the example tells about the Debian directory.
So fix the wording...
Op 12-11-2006 om 15:04 schreef Raphael Hertzog:
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > The text tells about the (upstream) source by using the generic name
> > "package", the example tells about the Debian directory.
>
> So fix the wording...
Value of this field should be an URL pointi
Hi,
in bug #391023, this description of this field is given:
+XS-Vcs-*
+
+ (where Vcs is the acronym for Version Control System,
+ and * stands for one of the Vcs supported by the package
+ tracking system: bzr, cvs, darcs,
+ git, hg, svn, tla)
+
tla is
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Geert Stappers wrote:
> The text tells about the (upstream) source by using the generic name
> "package", the example tells about the Debian directory.
So fix the wording... and don't change everything when there has been some
serious discussion on -devel and when lots of pack
Op 12-11-2006 om 09:58 schreef Andreas Barth:
> Hi,
>
> in bug #391023, this description of this field is given:
> +XS-Vcs-*
> +
> + Value of this field should be an URL pointing to where the repository
> of
> + the given package is available. The information is meant to be us
Hi,
in bug #391023, this description of this field is given:
+XS-Vcs-*
+
+ (where Vcs is the acronym for Version Control System,
+ and * stands for one of the Vcs supported by the package
+ tracking system: bzr, cvs, darcs,
+ git, hg, svn, tla)
+
+ Value of
15 matches
Mail list logo