On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Geert Stappers wrote: > The text tells about the (upstream) source by using the generic name > "package", the example tells about the Debian directory.
So fix the wording... and don't change everything when there has been some serious discussion on -devel and when lots of packages have started using this convention already. > So I propose to split into XS-Vcs-source-* & XS-Vcs-dpkg-* Please, no. The Debian source package is not meant as a source of generic meta-information of the upstream project. If you really want to make this kind of information available, you'd rather work on something useful for this like the collaborative repository of meta-information: http://wiki.debian.org/CRMI (which might be implemented within mole http://wiki.debian.org/mole) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
