Bug#390303: gtkpod segfaults

2007-05-06 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Phil Dibowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-07 08:33]: > Nico Golde wrote: [...] > >> Most of the segfault bugs should be gone in the experimental version > >> AFAIK > > > > Ok didn't now this, just wanted to catch the bug with the > > backtrace. I am new to this package :) > > So shall I

Bug#390303: gtkpod segfaults

2007-05-06 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-04 18:38]: >> On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 01:37:27PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: >>> can you please try gtkpod with the package from: >>> http://people.debian.org/~nion/gtkpod/gtkpod_0.99.4-2_i386.deb >>> It is the same package ava

Bug#375438: Bug#390303: gtkpod segfaults

2007-05-04 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-04 18:38]: > On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 01:37:27PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > can you please try gtkpod with the package from: > > http://people.debian.org/~nion/gtkpod/gtkpod_0.99.4-2_i386.deb > > It is the same package available in unstable buil

Bug#390303: gtkpod segfaults

2007-05-04 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 01:37:27PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > can you please try gtkpod with the package from: > http://people.debian.org/~nion/gtkpod/gtkpod_0.99.4-2_i386.deb > It is the same package available in unstable build with > debugging symbols. Huh? Why test the bugs with 0.99.4? Would

Bug#390303: gtkpod segfaults

2007-05-04 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, can you please try gtkpod with the package from: http://people.debian.org/~nion/gtkpod/gtkpod_0.99.4-2_i386.deb It is the same package available in unstable build with debugging symbols. Use the following: gdb `which gtkpod` Then type 'run' Get gtkpod to crash and then write 'bt full' into th