Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-04 18:38]: >> On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 01:37:27PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: >>> can you please try gtkpod with the package from: >>> http://people.debian.org/~nion/gtkpod/gtkpod_0.99.4-2_i386.deb >>> It is the same package available in unstable build with >>> debugging symbols. >> Why test the bugs with 0.99.4? Wouldn't it make more sense first to >> upload new gtkpod and libgpod from experimental to unstable and then >> test whether the bug actually still exists? >> >> Most of the segfault bugs should be gone in the experimental version >> AFAIK > > Ok didn't now this, just wanted to catch the bug with the > backtrace. I am new to this package :)
So shall I hold off on this until the next version makes it into unstable? -- Phil Dibowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Never write it in C if you can do it in 'awk'; Never do it in 'awk' if 'sed' can handle it; Never use 'sed' when 'tr' can do the job; Never invoke 'tr' when 'cat' is sufficient; Avoid using 'cat' whenever possible" -- Taylor's Laws of Programming
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
