On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:03:14PM +0200, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
>
> I believe dpt_i2o is deprecated, so perhaps it'd be a good idea to get rid of
> dpt_i2o completely in favour of i2o_block. But please don't take my word for
> it. You might want to check for a resolution in #370667 (i2
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 12:45:01PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 16, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what was the reason to leave this commented, but without this
> > line
> > i2o devices on 64-bit are broken
> It was commented before nobody was able
On Jun 16, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what was the reason to leave this commented, but without this
> line
> i2o devices on 64-bit are broken
It was commented before nobody was able to confirm that it's correct.
> (because dpt_i2o is unavailable, and we
Package: udev
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi!
I'm not sure what was the reason to leave this commented, but without this line
i2o devices on 64-bit are broken (because dpt_i2o is unavailable, and we have no
other choice):
diff -ur udev-0.093.old/rules/hotplug.rules udev-0.093/rules/hotplug.rule
4 matches
Mail list logo
