I've contacted the authour of the patch for a small comment, and will
pass on the details to this report when and if they come to hand.
Thanks, Kel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:16 +1000, kelmo wrote:
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 21:09 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
reopen 372208
|retitle |372208 Orinoco and wpa_supplicant not working with WEP
thanks
Hi,
I have a bad feeling about the
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:16 +1000, kelmo wrote:
> Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 21:09 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> >
> >> reopen 372208
> >> |retitle |372208 Orinoco and wpa_supplicant not working with WEP
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have a bad feeling about the i
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 21:09 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
reopen 372208
|retitle |372208 Orinoco and wpa_supplicant not working with WEP
thanks
Hi,
I have a bad feeling about the included patch and would like to drop it
for a few reasons:
1. I currently experien
reopen 372208
|retitle |372208 Orinoco and wpa_supplicant not working with WEP
thanks
Hi,
I have a bad feeling about the included patch and would like to drop it
for a few reasons:
1. I currently experience problems with WEP and madwifi (using wext
ioctl's), and have had difficulty deb
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 21:09 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> reopen 372208
> |retitle |372208 Orinoco and wpa_supplicant not working with WEP
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a bad feeling about the included patch and would like to drop it
> for a few reasons:
>
>1. I currently experience problems
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 23:20 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> Soeren,
>
> I have uploaded a snapshot of pkg-wpa svn (tagged as UNRELEASED). It is
> from the experimental branch and contains the wep-key-fix.
>
> http://users.tpg.com.au/sigm/misc/pkg-wpa/
>
> This snapshot also contains a huge update
Soeren,
I have uploaded a snapshot of pkg-wpa svn (tagged as UNRELEASED). It is
from the experimental branch and contains the wep-key-fix.
http://users.tpg.com.au/sigm/misc/pkg-wpa/
This snapshot also contains a huge update to ifupdown.sh, if anyone can
please take a look at those changes, i
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 19:50 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:48 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:19:08PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
[...]
Soeren,
I do not object to
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 20:10 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
[...]
> Wow. Now that is a bug report with some good information to work with.
>
> Lets see if we can whip up a wpasupplicant package (which i plan to request
> for upload this weekend anyway) with the fix/patch ap
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 19:50 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:48 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:19:08PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
[...]
> Soeren,
>
> I do not object to you reporting this, and I _really_ do
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:48 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:19:08PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
If these patches are for the development version of wpa_supplicant,
should they not be merged into upstream CVS, so that next time I take
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:48 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:19:08PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
>
> > If these patches are for the development version of wpa_supplicant,
> > should they not be merged into upstream CVS, so that next time I take a
> > snapshot, there i
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:19:08PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
If these patches are for the development version of wpa_supplicant,
should they not be merged into upstream CVS, so that next time I take a
snapshot, there is no need to carry along a large patch series?
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:19:08PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> If these patches are for the development version of wpa_supplicant,
> should they not be merged into upstream CVS, so that next time I take a
> snapshot, there is no need to carry along a large patch series?
It seems to me that t
severity 372208 wishlist
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.5.3+20060522-1
If these patches are for the development version of wpa_supplicant,
should they not be merged into upstream CVS, so that next time I take a
snapshot, there is no need to carry along a large
16 matches
Mail list logo
