Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 19:50 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:48 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:19:08PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
[...]
Soeren,
I do not object to you reporting this, and I _really_ do appreciate your
interest.
I just do not know how to react to a report that basically informed us
that Fedora have a patch series against wpa_supplicant (no version) that
fixes some problems (that are not described). Just need some more
specific information please.
Well I somehow assumed you read the networkmanager mailinglist ... which
is how I found this 'bug' but of course this is wpasupplicant so I
screwed up.
Anyway the bug I'd like to report is orinoco does not work w/ wep & nm:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343112
and when I read
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2006-June/msg00002.html
and went to http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/wpa_supplicant/
I found the above mentioned patches applied them to the experimental
version and nm was working (i.e. the wep key got set!). As the wep patch
is a one liner I guess it should be applied, and yes this bug is there
in wpasupplicant version 0.4.8 - to cvs-current + the wep patch will
still apply. I am not sure about the others and I don't know whether
they were necessary.
Thats all I wanted/have to say.
Wow. Now that is a bug report with some good information to work with.
Lets see if we can whip up a wpasupplicant package (which i plan to request for
upload this weekend anyway) with the fix/patch applied. Would you be willing to
test it out before it hits the actual archive? I do not have orinoco hardware
(and I don't think Reinhard does either).
Kel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
