On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:27:26PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Status update: We agreed on irc, that we will try this in experimental,
> with linking dynamically to the ffmpeg in experimental. This way, we can
> do speed comparisons on several architectures.
What is the status of this? It's r
Status update: We agreed on irc, that we will try this in experimental,
with linking dynamically to the ffmpeg in experimental. This way, we can
do speed comparisons on several architectures.
Gruesse,
Reinhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 19:28 +0200, Reinhard Tartler a écrit :
> On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 05:48:37PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > This is a wishlist bug, but please consider it as important. There is a
> > Debian package of ffmpeg, with shared versions of the library. Please
> > build libxi
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Siggi? How do you think about this suggestion? I know that next xine
release will update ffmpeg anyway, but how do you think about this in
general?
in general, that's a good idea.
However, isn't there still a patch required for ffmpeg to work with
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 05:48:37PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> This is a wishlist bug, but please consider it as important. There is a
> Debian package of ffmpeg, with shared versions of the library. Please
> build libxine1 against this package, so that libxine-based applications
> benefit of
Package: libxine1
Version: 1.1.1-1.1
Severity: wishlist
This is a wishlist bug, but please consider it as important. There is a
Debian package of ffmpeg, with shared versions of the library. Please
build libxine1 against this package, so that libxine-based applications
benefit of new ffmpeg versio
6 matches
Mail list logo
