Hi Joey,
> Err... could somebody enlighten me if this bug still holds or not?
>
> It seems that Michael asserted that it's not a bug, correct?
Correct.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7
Want to help with man page maintenance?
Grab
Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> > > > > Yes. I mean, if you open a report and immedaitely tag it
> > > > "upstream" means that the bug is not in the Debian .diff.gz, and the
> > > > version indicates what version the bug was found in.
> > >
> > > Oh -- thanks for the education. I had
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 01:19:28AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> > > > > > Tags: upstream
> > > > >
> > > > > Any time you open a report like this you better make sure
> > > > > that whatever you say holds against the latest upstream release.
> > > > Do you mean of manpages?
> >
Hi Justin,
> > > > > Tags: upstream
> > > >
> > > > Any time you open a report like this you better make sure
> > > > that whatever you say holds against the latest upstream release.
> > > Do you mean of manpages?
> >
> > Yes. I mean, if you open a report and immedaitely tag it
> "upstream" me
Hi Justin,
> > > > Yes. I mean, if you open a report and immedaitely tag it
> > > "upstream" means that the bug is not in the Debian .diff.gz, and the
> > > version indicates what version the bug was found in.
> >
> > Oh -- thanks for the education. I had guessed it means that the
> > report
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:38:17PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Justin,
>
> > > > Tags: upstream
> > >
> > > Any time you open a report like this you better make sure
> > > that whatever you say holds against the latest upstream release.
> > Do you mean of manpages?
>
> Yes. I mean, if you o
Justin,
> > > Tags: upstream
> >
> > Any time you open a report like this you better make sure
> > that whatever you say holds against the latest upstream release.
> Do you mean of manpages?
Yes. I mean, if you open a report and immedaitely tag it
upstream like this, my assumption would be tha
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:54:09AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Justin,
>
> > Tags: upstream
>
> Any time you open a report like this you better make sure
> that whatever you say holds against the latest upstream release.
Do you mean of manpages?
> > It seems that the clone manpage is out of
Justin,
> Tags: upstream
Any time you open a report like this you better make sure
that whatever you say holds against the latest upstream release.
> It seems that the clone manpage is out of sync with the libc/kernel
> reality.
>
> In particular, the following succeeds,
The preceding is near
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 2.25-3
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
It seems that the clone manpage is out of sync with the libc/kernel
reality.
In particular, the following succeeds, but the annotation says that it
should not:
CLONE_NEWNS|CLONE_FS
CLONE_THREAD (because CLONE_SIGHAND
10 matches
Mail list logo
