Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> > > > > Yes. I mean, if you open a report and immedaitely tag it
> > > > "upstream" means that the bug is not in the Debian .diff.gz, and the
> > > > version indicates what version the bug was found in.
> > >
> > > Oh -- thanks for the education. I had guessed it means that the
> > > report was targeted specifically at the upstream developer.
> > > Probably I did not read some Debain web pages closely.
> >
> > NP. We're lucky to have you as one of the few upstream developers who
> > are not only subscribed to the package, but also involved in its
> > maintenance, such as by adding fixed-upstream!
>
> Well, the thing is, Debian makes it (relatively) easy. If it wasn't
> so easy, I wouldn't bother. And Joey was helpful in educating me
> about the Debian process early on in my role as upstream maintainer.
Err... could somebody enlighten me if this bug still holds or not?
It seems that Michael asserted that it's not a bug, correct?
Regards,
Joey
--
Every use of Linux is a proper use of Linux. -- Jon 'maddog' Hall
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
