Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Two questions first of all, this is a testing/unstable bug,
> right? I had a vague memory from a LCA 2006 presentation that we were
> going to be desupporting the 2.4 kernel, or did I get that wrong? Not
> that this means we shouldn't fix the bug, but I'm wondering whe
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 08:08:47PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Hi Ted.. to summarize what needs doing for this bug,
> /usr/share/initrd-tools/scripts/e2fsprogs currently contains
> "LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4". This needs to change to "LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1"
Two questions first of all, this is a tes
Hi Ted.. to summarize what needs doing for this bug,
/usr/share/initrd-tools/scripts/e2fsprogs currently contains
"LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4". This needs to change to "LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1"
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
3 matches
Mail list logo
