tag 363399 +patch +pending
thanks
Hi Thomas,
> I've just fixed this bug in the 5.2.x CVS branch, too. Patch attached.
Thanks. I'll apply this (and upload all the i18n stuff as well).
Cheers,
Jochen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Is the 5.2.2 still actively developed?
Anyway, the patch fixes the problem. I leave in the DBTS a marker
that there is a patch for the problem.
The 5.2.x branch is still maintained -- in bug-fixes only mode.
The release cycle for 5.2.3 will start anytime soon, probably tod
tags 363399 + patch
stop
On 08.06.06 Thomas Anders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi Thomas,
> >So it seems to be a bug in 5.2.2, which has been fixed in 5.3.0.
> >Consider to upgrade the Debian package.
>
> I've just fixed this bug in the 5.2.x CVS branch, too. Patch
> atta
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
I did the same experiment using 5.2.2 (vanilla sources,
--with-defaults):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/net-snmp/net-snmp-5.2.2 $ apps/snmpget -On -v2c -c foobar
localhost:8161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 = OID: .1.3.6.0.0.0.0.0.0.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/net-snmp/net-snmp-5.
On 07.06.06 Thomas Anders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/t1/net-snmp-5.3.1.pre1 $ apps/snmpget -On -v2c -c foobar
> >localhost:8161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0
> >.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 = OID: .1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.3.2.10
> >
> >On 5.3.1.pre1, 5.3.1.pre3 and 5.3.0.1
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/t1/net-snmp-5.3.1.pre1 $ apps/snmpget -On -v2c -c foobar
localhost:8161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0
.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 = OID: .1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.3.2.10
On 5.3.1.pre1, 5.3.1.pre3 and 5.3.0.1.
foo# snmptranslate -mall .1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.3.2.10
NET-SNMP-TC::linux
On 29.05.06 Thomas Anders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ snmpget -v2c -c public 127.0.0.1:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0
> >SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 = OID: SNMPv2-SMI::dod.0.0.0.0.0.0.0
> >
> >. I've rebuilt the package from the sources and got the same r
On 29.05.06 Thomas Anders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ snmpget -v2c -c public 127.0.0.1:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0
> >SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 = OID: SNMPv2-SMI::dod.0.0.0.0.0.0.0
> >
> >. I've rebuilt the package from the sources and got the same r
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ snmpget -v2c -c public 127.0.0.1:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0
SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 = OID: SNMPv2-SMI::dod.0.0.0.0.0.0.0
. I've rebuilt the package from the sources and got the same result.
The configure options of the package do not manipulate the
sysOb
On 20.04.06 Thomas Anders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi all,
> >>So should we go for linux and unknown as platform? Or always
> >>unknown?
> >>
> >I've upstream in Cc. Ask them for either updating the MIB or go for
> >unknown.
>
> Can you please give your exact platform d
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
So should we go for linux and unknown as platform? Or always
unknown?
I've upstream in Cc. Ask them for either updating the MIB or go for
unknown.
Can you please give your exact platform details?
"unknown" should cover any system not mentioned explicitely before:
hpux9
On 19.04.06 Jochen Friedrich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Jochen,
> > The default value of the sysObjectID is .1.3.6.0.0.0.0.0.0.0, which
> > is not a valuable information. I've compared it to an how grown net
> > snmp 5.0.6, which give out on that OID the value
> > .1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.3.2.xx (whe
Hi Hilmar,
> The default value of the sysObjectID is .1.3.6.0.0.0.0.0.0.0, which
> is not a valuable information. I've compared it to an how grown net
> snmp 5.0.6, which give out on that OID the value
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.3.2.xx (where xx is one of the numbers 1-13
> depending on which OS it is ru
13 matches
Mail list logo
