On 6/5/06, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The issue is that I uploaded -3; it was not a QA upload. My changes in
> -3 seem to have been omitted from the QA upload of -4. See (far) below
> for the changelog from my -3 upload.
>
Sure, I read the changelog before composing my previous
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:00:14PM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> On 6/4/06, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Apparently, yes, it is! How's this for irony. The QA upload of
> >> 0.1.2.2-4 reverted the changes from 0.1.2.2-3 and broke the package!
> >> Funny.
> >
> >How's that? I just t
On 6/4/06, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently, yes, it is! How's this for irony. The QA upload of
> 0.1.2.2-4 reverted the changes from 0.1.2.2-3 and broke the package!
> Funny.
How's that? I just took what was in unstable and rebuilt it. I don't go
reverting things. Strange
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 10:45:16AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> On 6/4/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >found 361603 0.1.2.2-4
> >thanks
> >
> >* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 21:11]:
> >> * Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 13:07]:
> >> > It should
On 6/4/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
found 361603 0.1.2.2-4
thanks
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 21:11]:
> * Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 13:07]:
> > It should be noted that this bug only affects 64-bit targets. This
> > patch is untested o
found 361603 0.1.2.2-4
thanks
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 21:11]:
> * Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 13:07]:
> > It should be noted that this bug only affects 64-bit targets. This
> > patch is untested on 64-bit targets, but should fix the issue.
> This works,
* Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 13:07]:
> It should be noted that this bug only affects 64-bit targets. This
> patch is untested on 64-bit targets, but should fix the issue.
This works, thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
package simulavr
tag 361603 patch
thanks
It should be noted that this bug only affects 64-bit targets. This
patch is untested on 64-bit targets, but should fix the issue.
Cheers,
Shaun
--- simulavr-0.1.2.2.orig/src/intvects.h
+++ simulavr-0.1.2.2/src/intvects.h
@@ -82,8 +82,9 @@
/* Macro to cal
Package: simulavr
Version: 0.1.2.2-2
Your package fails to build with GCC 4.2. Version 4.2 has not been
released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors
and give people an advance warning. The bug below is in your package
and not because I'm using a snapshot of the compiler
9 matches
Mail list logo