On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 10:45:16AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote: > On 6/4/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >found 361603 0.1.2.2-4 > >thanks > > > >* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 21:11]: > >> * Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 13:07]: > >> > It should be noted that this bug only affects 64-bit targets. This > >> > patch is untested on 64-bit targets, but should fix the issue. > >> This works, thanks. > > > >Is it possible that this change got lost? 0.1.2.2-4 fails to build on > >Alpha with GCC 4.2. > > Apparently, yes, it is! How's this for irony. The QA upload of > 0.1.2.2-4 reverted the changes from 0.1.2.2-3 and broke the package! > Funny.
How's that? I just took what was in unstable and rebuilt it. I don't go reverting things. Strange in this particular case how I did two uploads of the package though... Too long (and too many packages) ago to remember the specifics. regards Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
