if .config is the future, then i wish not to stand in its way. my
point was that as a unix nerd for 4 years now, this convention was
completely unfamilar and alien to me, and thus unfamiliar to the many.
in fact, it appears to be an xfce-only convention. should you not be
pushing this convention
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 23:15 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> so both kde and gnome choose to violate the freedesktop standard that
> they themselves defined? is this something new that they have yet to
> adopt?
Gnome uses for example this specification for menu files (located in
$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/m
so both kde and gnome choose to violate the freedesktop standard that
they themselves defined? is this something new that they have yet to
adopt?
the latest revision of the XDG specification appears to be from 2004.
maybe it is a standard that did not catch on, and should be discarded?
or perha
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 23:22 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Package: xfce4
> Version: 4.2.3
> Severity: normal
>
> it does not make logical sense that xfce settings are stored in the
> user's ~/.config directory...config could mean anything. i had to do a
> search to figure out where the settin
Package: xfce4
Version: 4.2.3
Severity: normal
it does not make logical sense that xfce settings are stored in the
user's ~/.config directory...config could mean anything. i had to do a
search to figure out where the settings were (not that difficult, but
nevertheless annoying). it would make
5 matches
Mail list logo
