Bug#349278: closed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) (Re: Bug#349278: closed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) (Re: Bug#349278: module-init-tools: man lsmod should detail output description))

2006-06-05 Thread Filipus Klutiero
s database) Sujet: Re: Bug#349278: closed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) (Re: Bug#349278: module-init-tools: man lsmod should detail output description) Expéditeur: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) Date: Sun, 4 Jun

Bug#349278: closed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) (Re: Bug#349278: module-init-tools: man lsmod should detail output description)

2006-06-04 Thread Filipus Klutiero
reopen 349278 thanks Marco d'Itri a écrit : On Jun 04, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: it's not necessarily "important" indeed, but the issue is still in 3.2.2-3. I am sorry if I have not been clear enough in my precedent message. I do not consider this a bug, and I do no

Bug#349278: closed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) (Re: Bug#349278: module-init-tools: man lsmod should detail output description)

2006-06-04 Thread Filipus Klutiero
found 349278 3.2.2-3 thanks On Jan 22, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It would be nice to have a little more details about the output, despite If you care, please send a patch. I will assume that this was not really important. Hi Marco, it's not necessarily "impor

Bug#349278: module-init-tools: man lsmod should detail output description

2006-01-21 Thread Marco d'Itri
tag 349278 upstream help thanks On Jan 22, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be nice to have a little more details about the output, despite If you care, please send a patch. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#349278: module-init-tools: man lsmod should detail output description

2006-01-21 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Package: module-init-tools Version: 3.2.2-1 Severity: wishlist lsmod's manpage reads nicely formats the contents of the /proc/modules It would be nice to have a little more details about the output, despite it being rather simple. I'm particularly wondering if the Size is really in octets. -- S