Daniel Webb wrote:
> Yes, the development (1.1.5) doesn't play nice with the stable (1.0.3), I was
> unclear. The problem is that rdiff-backup in Debian in incompatible with
> rdiff-backup in other distros (like Gentoo) that use the stable branch. I run
> sarge, but I'm trading backups with a fri
> In sarge, we have 0.13.4-5. This version is not a development version,
> it is just horribly outdated.
Oh, ok I was probably just confused about it, I thought Ben was using an odd
second number in the version to indicate the development branch. I would
image you know better than me on that.
>
Daniel Webb wrote:
> I'm confused why the versions in sarge and unstable are both from Ben's
> development branches of rdiff-backup?
In sarge, we have 0.13.4-5. This version is not a development version,
it is just horribly outdated.
> The current stable version of
> rdiff-backup is 1.0.3.
In si
Package: rdiff-backup
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I'm confused why the versions in sarge and unstable are both from Ben's
development branches of rdiff-backup? The current stable version of
rdiff-backup is 1.0.3. Ben also wondered why Debian is doing this wh
4 matches
Mail list logo
