Daniel Webb wrote: > I'm confused why the versions in sarge and unstable are both from Ben's > development branches of rdiff-backup?
In sarge, we have 0.13.4-5. This version is not a development version, it is just horribly outdated. > The current stable version of > rdiff-backup is 1.0.3. In sid, I decided to use the development branch of rdiff-backup because it already contains the patches applied upstream instead of pulling them into the diff.gz myself. As soon as there is a 1.2.x release, I will possibly switch back to rdiff-backup stable releases. > The current stable and > unstable branches don't play nice together, as other bug reporters have > reported. You mean, rdiff-backup stable and unstable release. But.. the one remaining in testing is just a question of time before it is replaced by the migrated sid version. So, there is no rdiff-backup stable release in debian (except sarge, but sarge does not ship the current stable release of rdiff-backup either). So what is actually the problem then? Besides.. for sarge you can use my packages at backports.org which are always in sync with the packages in sid. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
