On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:23:11PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> Back to the bugreport. I'm not really sure if bug #340601 is really a
> bug in OpenLDAP. I think there is some locking done in OpenLDAP that is
> not strictly necessary on glibc but this is based on an examination of
> the source cod
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 12:01 -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Have you tried replacing libnss-ldap with libnss-ldapd (only
> > available in testing/unstable) ?
>
> The bug submitter is the maintainer and author of nss-ldapd, so I
> suspect he may have done so ;)
>
> But you didn't send your message
> Have you tried replacing libnss-ldap with libnss-ldapd (only available
> in testing/unstable) ?
The bug submitter is the maintainer and author of nss-ldapd, so I suspect he
may have done so ;)
But you didn't send your message to the bug submitter. Forwarding now.
--
Steve Langasek
Have you tried replacing libnss-ldap with libnss-ldapd (only available
in testing/unstable) ?
James Andrewartha
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4 matches
Mail list logo
