On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:23:11PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote: > Back to the bugreport. I'm not really sure if bug #340601 is really a > bug in OpenLDAP. I think there is some locking done in OpenLDAP that is > not strictly necessary on glibc but this is based on an examination of > the source code I did a year ago so take it with a grain of salt.
It's plausible to me that it is an OpenLDAP bug, it might be caused by the fact that we have two separate ldap libraries linked in in the case of ldapsearch+nss_ldap and this might be causing symbol confusion. If so, this bug should shake out once openldap 2.4 is packaged. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
