Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-18 Thread Eugene B. Berdnikov
Hi, MartМn. On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 01:25:15PM -0300, MartМn Ferrari wrote: > > Thank you for this reference. As a Debian maintainer you can update URL > > in the "vtun" package description block, and I ask you to do that. > > The homepage in the description is correct. Only that the download

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-18 Thread Eugene Berdnikov
Hi, MartМn. The fix for an UDP timeout handling bug is in a patch below. It was compiled with lzo1 and verified on Debian/testing. Version of VTUN was incremented to 3.0.2. In next mail I'll return to the discussion and answer questions. -- Eugene Berdnikov --

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread bishop
Oops. I'll update the page. Eugene Berdnikov wrote: Where is 3.01? Page http://vtun.sourceforge.net/download.html have only references for 3.0.0, that's why I did not submit this patch again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread Martín Ferrari
Eugene, On 10/17/07, Eugene Berdnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's outdated, use > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2947 > > Thank you for this reference. As a Debian maintainer you can update URL > in the "vtun" package description block, and I ask you to do th

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread Eugene Berdnikov
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:57:19AM -0300, MartМn Ferrari wrote: > On 10/17/07, Eugene Berdnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Where is 3.01? Page http://vtun.sourceforge.net/download.html have only > > references for 3.0.0, that's why I did not submit this patch again. > > That's outdated, use

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 10/17/07, Eugene Berdnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 01:05:11AM -0700, bishop wrote: > > That patch looks pretty mangled and the (apparent) Artifact ID it > > references doesn't look valid. > ... > > I've recognized to be the bug so reported. I'll put it on my queue,

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread Eugene Berdnikov
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 01:05:11AM -0700, bishop wrote: > That patch looks pretty mangled and the (apparent) Artifact ID it > references doesn't look valid. ... > I've recognized to be the bug so reported. I'll put it on my queue, but > I can't say when I'd be able to generate a set of patches f

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread Martín Ferrari
Hi Bishop, On 10/17/07, bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That patch looks pretty mangled and the (apparent) Artifact ID it > references doesn't look valid. > > Is the problem still occurring? But I think you're asking the same > question, and I've never seen such a problem in my own set-up; n

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread bishop
Hi Martin, That patch looks pretty mangled and the (apparent) Artifact ID it references doesn't look valid. Is the problem still occurring? But I think you're asking the same question, and I've never seen such a problem in my own set-up; not that I've recognized to be the bug so reported.