Hi Bishop, On 10/17/07, bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That patch looks pretty mangled and the (apparent) Artifact ID it > references doesn't look valid. > > Is the problem still occurring? But I think you're asking the same > question, and I've never seen such a problem in my own set-up; not that As you guessed, I don't know and haven't ever seen that problem. But then again, it's very specific and I don't know how to reproduce it. Maybe the OP (who should be receiving copies of this can enlighten us?). > I've recognized to be the bug so reported. I'll put it on my queue, but > I can't say when I'd be able to generate a set of patches from 301. > > Anyone else care to reformat the diff as mentioned on the Debian site > and review it? Please CC me if anyone finds something about this, I'm not subscribed. Thanks for your kind help, as usual :) -- Martín Ferrari
