On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:09:15AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Perhaps the maintainer should file a request with the FTP masters to
> >> have it removed, at which point the bug will be automatically closed.
> > Bugs aren't automatically clos
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > The link you post only lists libguile9 in _stable_.
>
> No, it doesn't. I can only wonder if you actually follewd it.
Yes, it does. The fact that kfreebsd-i386, an unofficial arch, is st
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now, that we are back on track, do you know whether this bug should be
> reassigned or closed ?
The similar bug in guile-1.6 has been fixed. It's up to the
maintainer, but I think it can be closed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:25:06AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sorry, I meant libguile9
> libguile9 has not actually been removed from unstable;
yes, it has.
> see
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&vers
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Perhaps the maintainer should file a request with the FTP masters to
>> have it removed, at which point the bug will be automatically closed.
>
> Bugs aren't automatically closed on package removal.
Curious; I get such messages all the time when packa
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:25:06AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:52:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > Hello Rob and Thomas,
> >> >
> >> > This bug is assigned to lib
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:25:06AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:52:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Hello Rob a
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:08:37AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> libguile9 has not actually been removed from unstable; see
> >> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=libguile9.
> >
> > The link you post only lists libguile9 in _s
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Rob and Thomas,
>
> This bug is assigned to libglade9 which has been removed from
> unstable.
>
> As a consequence, this bug should either be closed or reassigned.
Bug 337346 (in your subject line) has nothing to do with glade, and is
closed as of guile-1.6/1.
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:52:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello Rob and Thomas,
> >
> > This bug is assigned to libglade9 which has been removed from
> > unstable.
> >
> > As a consequence, this bug should either be closed or reassigned.
>
> Bug 337
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:52:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Hello Rob and Thomas,
>> >
>> > This bug is assigned to libglade9 which has been removed from
>> > unstable.
>> >
>> > As a consequence, this b
Hello Rob and Thomas,
This bug is assigned to libglade9 which has been removed from
unstable.
As a consequence, this bug should either be closed or reassigned.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, it should contain all the "important parts", but should be
> modified to work appropriately for guile, whatever that means. It
> looks to me like in the past, guile may have been modifying guile.init
> to produce ice-9/slib.scm. However, without k
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So the slib upgrade to version 3a2 doesn't work because the ice-9
> has a slib.scm file which should be a copy (or near copy) of the
> slib file "guile.init".
Well, it should contain all the "important parts", but should be
modified to work approp
So the slib upgrade to version 3a2 doesn't work because the ice-9
has a slib.scm file which should be a copy (or near copy) of the slib
file "guile.init".
Version 3a2 has added the function "with-load-pathname" and it isn't
in the slib.scm file that the guile packages provide.
It seems to me t
15 matches
Mail list logo
