Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:25:06AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:52:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> >> > Hello Rob and Thomas, >> >> > >> >> > This bug is assigned to libglade9 which has been removed from >> >> > unstable. >> >> > >> >> > As a consequence, this bug should either be closed or reassigned. >> >> >> >> Bug 337346 (in your subject line) has nothing to do with glade, and is >> >> closed as of guile-1.6/1.6.7-2. >> >> >> >> Bug 337358 (to which you sent the email) doesn't mention libglade9 at >> >> all, and is not assigned to libglade9. >> > >> > Sorry, I meant libguile9 >> >> libguile9 has not actually been removed from unstable; see >> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=libguile9. > > The link you post only lists libguile9 in _stable_.
No, it doesn't. I can only wonder if you actually follewd it. I see the following when I follow that link. What do you see?
bin7ymnG2So9D.bin
Description: html
Thomas
