Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Daniel Burrows a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:35:25AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
Well I don't see what will change if lm-sensors recommends
lm-sensors-2.4.27-2-386 as default, except some confusion to the
users. They will insta
Daniel Burrows a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:35:25AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
Well I don't see what will change if lm-sensors recommends
lm-sensors-2.4.27-2-386 as default, except some confusion to the users.
They will install it, and nothing will wor
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:35:25AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Well I don't see what will change if lm-sensors recommends
> lm-sensors-2.4.27-2-386 as default, except some confusion to the users.
> They will install it, and nothing will work.
>
> Currently, here
Hi,
Daniel Burrows a écrit :
Package: lm-sensors
Version: 1:2.9.2-4
Severity: normal
lm-sensors Recommends lm-sensors-mod-2.9.2 | kernel-image-2.6;
as a result, users who install this package will get a random Provider of
lm-sensors-mod-2.9.2 along with it (if this recommendation isn't alread
Package: lm-sensors
Version: 1:2.9.2-4
Severity: normal
lm-sensors Recommends lm-sensors-mod-2.9.2 | kernel-image-2.6;
as a result, users who install this package will get a random Provider of
lm-sensors-mod-2.9.2 along with it (if this recommendation isn't already
satisfied). You should includ
5 matches
Mail list logo
