Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Daniel Burrows a écrit :

On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:35:25AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:

Well I don't see what will change if lm-sensors recommends lm-sensors-2.4.27-2-386 as default, except some confusion to the users. They will install it, and nothing will work.

Currently, here is what happens:

| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get install lm-sensors
| Reading package lists... Done
| Building dependency tree... Done
| The following extra packages will be installed:
|   libsensors3 ucf
| Suggested packages:
| lm-sensors-mod-2.9.2 kernel-image-2.6 lm-sensors-source i2c-source | sensord read-edid



  This is a bug in apt-get, which does not install recommendations and
apparently treats them like Suggests.  Here is what happens in a properly
behaving package manager:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ aptitude -s install lm-sensors
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done Building tag database... Done The following NEW packages will be automatically installed: i2c-2.4.27-2-386 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 lm-sensors-2.4.27-2-386 The following NEW packages will be installed: i2c-2.4.27-2-386 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 lm-sensors lm-sensors-2.4.27-2-386 0 packages upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 11.4MB/11.9MB of archives. After unpacking 32.2MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]

  ...except that since this dependency is pure virtual, which package
gets picked to fulfill it is unpredictable; it might just as well have
installed lm-sensors-2.4.27-2-k7 instead.


I still don't see why installing lm-sensors-2.4.27-2-386 is better than a random package among lm-sensors-2.4* here.

Any more comment about this bug, or could I close it?

Bye,
Aurelien

--
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno             | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   [EMAIL PROTECTED]         | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to