Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-22 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to figure out what needs fixing and fix it, but I want to be > careful because some of the emacsen-common stuff is trickier than I > often think at first glance. > > > I wouldn't have a problem with that, it's your choice. Perhaps there is > > a

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-22 Thread Peter Galbraith
reassign 329114 emacs-goodies-el 24.15-1 retitle 329114 copy .el files next to .elc files for find-function thanks The bug is really fixed now, with last night's upload of 24.15-1. But something should be done to re-allow the inclusion of non-shadowing .el files that the fix broke. Either emacse

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-22 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How likely it is that we can get emacsen-common fixed? That package has > > seen a single upload since `oldstable' (woody?) > > Hmm, though there was a long period with no uploads, 1.4.16 was > uploade

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-21 Thread Rob Browning
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How likely it is that we can get emacsen-common fixed? That package has > seen a single upload since `oldstable' (woody?) Hmm, though there was a long period with no uploads, 1.4.16 was uploaded in January and should be in testing and sarge. -- R

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-21 Thread Rob Browning
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know, Rob appears to be active but the package has certainly > seen less attention than it deserves. It should be about to see substantially more. I'd like to figure out what needs fixing and fix it, but I want to be careful because some of

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-21 Thread Romain Francoise
reopen 329114 reassign 329114 gnus-bonus-el 24.14-1 severity 329114 normal kthxbye The nnnil and spam-stat packages (mentioned in my initial report) are still shadowed in gnus-bonus-el version 24.14-1. Please fix this as well. Thanks! -- ,''`. : :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-20 Thread Romain Francoise
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I'm sure that was done for a valid reason. Yep, but it's hard to tell which... > If I have to resort to the symlink solution, everybody who gets this > problem will have to do the same thing. If emacsen-common gets fixed, > it's fixed for ev

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-20 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 1- Perhaps if I don't explicitely add > >/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/emacs-goodies-el/ to the load-path, it > >will get added automatically at the tail end, because it is a > >subdirectory o

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-20 Thread Romain Francoise
Peter Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1- Perhaps if I don't explicitely add >/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/emacs-goodies-el/ to the load-path, it >will get added automatically at the tail end, because it is a >subdirectory of /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp ? Nope, it won't be added a

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-20 Thread Peter Galbraith
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Anyone have any bright ideas? > > Create /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/emacs-goodies-el// > directories, populate them with symlinks to only the files we want for > each flavor, and add that to the loa

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-20 Thread Romain Francoise
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyone have any bright ideas? Create /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/emacs-goodies-el// directories, populate them with symlinks to only the files we want for each flavor, and add that to the load-path instead. It isn't pretty, but it should work... --

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-19 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The emacs-goodies-el and gnus-bonus-el packages shadow a number of > packages included in emacs-snapshot. This is problematic because some > of these packages are maintained in Emacs CVS and are newer in > emacs-snapshot than in emacs-goodies-el, or m

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-19 Thread Romain Francoise
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'll add them to the byte-compilation exclusion. I assume it declares > a flavor of emacs-snapshot? Or is it emacs22? It's emacs-snapshot. The emacs22 packages will have the same problem but I guess there's no need to plan ahead... > You're the

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-19 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: emacs-goodies-el > Version: 24.12-1 > Severity: important important a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone. Hmmm... > The emacs-goodies-el and gnus-bonu

Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages

2005-09-19 Thread Romain Francoise
Package: emacs-goodies-el Version: 24.12-1 Severity: important The emacs-goodies-el and gnus-bonus-el packages shadow a number of packages included in emacs-snapshot. This is problematic because some of these packages are maintained in Emacs CVS and are newer in emacs-snapshot than in emacs-goodi