Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I'm sure that was done for a valid reason.
Yep, but it's hard to tell which... > If I have to resort to the symlink solution, everybody who gets this > problem will have to do the same thing. If emacsen-common gets fixed, > it's fixed for everybody! > How likely it is that we can get emacsen-common fixed? That package has > seen a single upload since `oldstable' (woody?) I don't know, Rob appears to be active but the package has certainly seen less attention than it deserves. Perhaps Rob would be willing to hand off maintenance of this package to a team of Emacs people in Debian if we ask. > I'd rather REMOVE /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/emacs-goodies-el from the > load-path altogether, except that breaks the ability to jump to the code > when viewing variables and functions via `C-h v' and `C-h f'. Much > easier and cleaner than maintaining a collection of symlinks... I wouldn't have a problem with that, it's your choice. Perhaps there is an alternate solution that we haven't thought of yet... -- ,''`. : :' : Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
