Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patch is attached.
Thank you.
> There was no development in debiandoc-sgml since Sarge :-((
In that case, should you need a sponsor for the upload, drop me a mail.
> Please note when compiling DDP documents that many (especially those
> which contain As
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:19:19PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:05:52PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Using [hypertex] for DVI output results in line breaking in URL links,
> >> I have checked this. Internal links will not
Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:05:52PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>>
>> The documentation of hyperref is notoriously outdated with respect to
>> the package. In fact it chooses "pdftex" for pdflatex in PDF mode, and
>> the "default" driver for DVI mode. Howe
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:05:52PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:17:52PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Instead I suggest
> >
> > I can only guess that you mean (I noticed that already
Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:17:52PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > However, for the time being, you should use ifpdf.sty instead:
>> >
>> > \usepackage{ifpdf}
>> > \ifpdf
>> > \usepackage[hypertex,colorlinks=true]{
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:17:52PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, for the time being, you should use ifpdf.sty instead:
> >
> > \usepackage{ifpdf}
> > \ifpdf
> > \usepackage[hypertex,colorlinks=true]{hyperref}
> > \else
> > \usepackage[pdftex,color
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Please note that bug #214249 was the reason that I introduced
>>
>> \ifx\pdfoutput\undefined
>> \usepackage[hypertex,colorlinks=true]{hyperref}
>> \else
>> \usepackage[pdftex,colorlinks=true]{hyperref}
>> \fi
>>
tags 321942 + fixed-upstream pending
thanks
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:50:13PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Indeed, I missed the problem with breaklinks and dvips vs. hypertex.
> I'll investigate this, and maybe we'll find a fix that does not need to
> differentiate between PDF and DVI output.
Gr
Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Is the patch backwards compatible? (i.e., when used with teTeX-2.0,
>> > will be the output correct?) If so, I would file at important and
>> > ask for the patch to be applied ASAP; and NMU prior to uploading
>> > teTeX-3.0 if it has not been fix
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:03:55AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Frank Küster [Mon, 08 Aug 2005 12:39:04 +0200]:
> >> You can stop all build-depending on debiandoc-sgml: It has the classical
> >> bug that produces PDF output with teTeX-3.0 even when
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Frank Küster [Mon, 08 Aug 2005 12:39:04 +0200]:
>
>> You can stop all build-depending on debiandoc-sgml: It has the classical
>> bug that produces PDF output with teTeX-3.0 even when dvi is desired,
>> causing almost everything to FTBFS. I've not yet s
11 matches
Mail list logo
