tags 321942 + fixed-upstream pending
thanks
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:50:13PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Indeed, I missed the problem with breaklinks and dvips vs. hypertex.
> I'll investigate this, and maybe we'll find a fix that does not need to
> differentiate between PDF and DVI output.
Great.
> However, for the time being, you should use ifpdf.sty instead:
>
> \usepackage{ifpdf}
> \ifpdf
> \usepackage[hypertex,colorlinks=true]{hyperref}
> \else
> \usepackage[pdftex,colorlinks=true]{hyperref}
> \fi
Fixed in CVS (but the statements need to be swapped).
> You can have a look at the code in ifpdf.sty. The purpose of all that
> is not only to correctly detect whether we are running TeX, or pdfTeX in
> DVI mode, or pdfTeX in PDF mode, but also to not change the
> "definedness" and the setting of \pdfoutput, so that this can be checked
> again. The code you use does not only fail with pdfTeX in DVI mode, it
> also has the side effect that now \pdftex is \relax even when TeX is
> used, and doing the test a second time will fail.
This is only true for linuxdoc-tools since this package uses "\pdfoutput=1" but
I understand :-))
Regards, Jens
P.S. Osamu or Ardo please upload a new package. I tested it (not in such
detail as usual since I have a few problems such as lack of disc space)
and it works as expected.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
