Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14.08.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> > So we either write that manpage or remove the reference to it. I
>> > assume both bugs to be equivalent, merged already. Further I'm not
>> >
On 14.08.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > So we either write that manpage or remove the reference to it. I
> > assume both bugs to be equivalent, merged already. Further I'm not
> > really sure if it does make sense to write a man page
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04.08.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> It is referenced in updmap(1), and its syntax differs from the
>> individual map files. Quoting upstream (unfortunately in german):
>>
> So we either write that manpage or remove the refe
On 04.08.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> It is referenced in updmap(1), and its syntax differs from the
> individual map files. Quoting upstream (unfortunately in german):
>
So we either write that manpage or remove the reference to it. I
assume both bugs to be equivalent, merg
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-5.0.sarge1
Severity: normal
It is referenced in updmap(1), and its syntax differs from the
individual map files. Quoting upstream (unfortunately in german):
Hi Frank,
> mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass in updmap(1) auf updmap.cfg(5)
> verwiesen wird, aber diese M
5 matches
Mail list logo