Bug#316549: time-daemon pseudopackage

2020-01-12 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Control: affects -1 src:ntp Am 13.01.20 um 02:02 schrieb Michael Biebl: Hi Michael, On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:49:45 -0400 Justin Pryzby wrote: Package: chrony, ntp Severity: normal Only openntpd provides, conflicts, replaces: time-daemon. Seems all NTP clients (ntpsec, chrony, openntpd) aside

Bug#316549: time-daemon pseudopackage

2020-01-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Berni On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:49:45 -0400 Justin Pryzby wrote: > Package: chrony, ntp > Severity: normal > > Only openntpd provides, conflicts, replaces: time-daemon. Seems all NTP clients (ntpsec, chrony, openntpd) aside from ntp itself have Conflict/Replaces/Provides: time-daemon nowadays

Bug#316549: time-daemon pseudopackage

2007-10-04 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
(I'm the original submitter of #428211.) > I can only repeat my earlier answer: There is no definition of what a > time-daemon virtual package does, so it's a completely random guess as to > what should be done here. I can only agree with Peter, unfortunately. Like many other programs in Debia

Bug#445066: Bug#316549: time-daemon pseudopackage

2007-10-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2007 schrieb Philipp Kern: > I've got one and I got mildly annoyed that this was not solved for ntp > yet. I just got a bugreport against my package which wants chrony to be > added to the `ntpdate | ntp' dependency of it. An accurate time is > needed for aiccu just like for

Bug#445066: Bug#316549: time-daemon pseudopackage

2007-10-03 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:17:53PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: [time-daemon] > > > What would be the operational benefit from having such a > > > pseudopackage? > > It's recommended by policy; > > /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/virtual-package-names-list.txt.gz > That is not an operational reaso

Bug#316549: time-daemon pseudopackage

2006-06-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Justin Pryzby wrote: > > What would be the operational benefit from having such a > > pseudopackage? > > It's recommended by policy; > /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/virtual-package-names-list.txt.gz That is not an operational reason. The virtual package name list does not specify the precise in

Bug#316549: time-daemon pseudopackage

2006-03-01 Thread Justin Pryzby
Can I expect to see this bug fixed for etch? http://bugs.debian.org/316549 Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#316549: time-daemon pseudopackage

2005-07-01 Thread John Hasler
Thank you for your report. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#316549: time-daemon pseudopackage

2005-07-01 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package: chrony, ntp Severity: normal Only openntpd provides, conflicts, replaces: time-daemon. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]