Justin Pryzby wrote: > > What would be the operational benefit from having such a > > pseudopackage? > > It's recommended by policy; > /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/virtual-package-names-list.txt.gz
That is not an operational reason. The virtual package name list does not specify the precise interfaces that a virtual package providing package needs to offer, so by itself it's useless as a guideline. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
