# Bcc: control
reassign 315538 lintian
thanks
On 06/07/21 14:43 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar said ...
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 04:09:25PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> >
> > > dput doesn't refuse to operate on doubly-signed .changes. But katie
> > > will choke
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 14:43 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> This would mean that the queue processer would need to gain a fuzzy
> parser: need to cope with random data prepended, and still find
> out/guess what's the problem.
>
> It's much easier for dput (and co) to gain some check whether
retitle 315538 dput: add syntax check for .changes
thanks
Hi Jeroen,
indeed, dput could easily do the check for a valid changes file format
(the title has been a red herring here), and I'm willing to include such
a check.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> This would mean that the queue processer wo
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 04:09:25PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> > dput doesn't refuse to operate on doubly-signed .changes. But katie
> > will choke on those, and is not able to extract the Uploader, so the
> > uploader won't get any feedback.
> [...]
> > It's n
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> dput doesn't refuse to operate on doubly-signed .changes. But katie
> will choke on those, and is not able to extract the Uploader, so the
> uploader won't get any feedback.
[...]
> It's not large, but when it happens, there is no feedback on what
> happened, as the
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 05:53:47PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> thank you for your investigation of the issue and your resulting
> suggestion.
> I do think that this might be a good check to do and will consider
> implementing it.
> Do you happen to have any idea though how large
Hi Jeroen,
thank you for your investigation of the issue and your resulting
suggestion.
I do think that this might be a good check to do and will consider
implementing it.
Do you happen to have any idea though how large this problem is? After
all, I don't think debsign allows creation of doubly-si
Package: dput
Severity: wishlist
dput doesn't refuse to operate on doubly-signed .changes. But katie
will choke on those, and is not able to extract the Uploader, so the
uploader won't get any feedback.
It'd be beneficial for all (uploaders, and ftpmasters who get a mail
when this happens) if dpu
8 matches
Mail list logo
