Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > dput doesn't refuse to operate on doubly-signed .changes. But katie > will choke on those, and is not able to extract the Uploader, so the > uploader won't get any feedback. [...] > It's not large, but when it happens, there is no feedback on what > happened, as the upload queue processor does *not* fail on it but > reports success back, and then you get silence.
What I'm missing here is why not fix the tools that don't give the right feedback rather than trying to patch every possible method of uploading new packages? I'd attack the problem at the source. Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
